Additional Insured and Indemnity Requirements in Your Contracts: Will Your Insurance Respond?
By Brad Burnham
Agreements between general and subcontractors have been changing in recent years. Many, if not all, contracts have always had an insurance provision requiring the subcontractor to carry specific types of policies and limits of insurance. More recently, requirements for Excess Liability (Umbrella) and Workers’ Compensation have been included and many general contractors now require very specific wording on the Certificate of Insurance.
Contracts may call for the subcontractor to specifically name the general contractor (GC) and/or owner as an “Additional Insured” and require very specific wording about the completed operations coverage and far-reaching indemnification.
The requirements may include the subcontractor assuming so much of the GC’s liability that the insurance company becomes unable or unwilling to provide the coverage needed, leaving the subcontractor out of compliance. Some insurance agents will issue the Certificate of Insurance without understanding the scope of the coverage and without reading the client’s contracts and insurance requirements. However, only the policy itself defines the coverage and will always supersede a Certificate of Insurance.
Are you out of compliance with your subcontract agreements?
- Look at your current contracts for the Insurance and Indemnity Provisions.
- Ask a qualified construction insurance agent to explain how your current insurance program will respond to the contract requirements.
- Send contracts to your attorney and insurance agent prior to signing them.
Why have the contracts changed?
- More litigation in our society – a “find fault first” approach to occurrences
- Rising defense and investigative costs
- Risk managers (rightfully) assuring that any claims are paid by the party causing the injury or property damage
By indemnifying, the subcontractor promises that it will stand by its work and protect the general contractor from all claims, including those for defective work, injuries and property damage. General contractors generally will not hire subcontractors without the inclusion of such a provision, and they are not unreasonable. What the subcontractor must avoid is a provision that obligates it beyond acts and omissions that it or its employees performed. Indemnification clauses that require the subcontractor to indemnify the GC for work beyond the subcontractor’s control are not reasonable and, in many states, not enforceable. A reasonable general contractor will agree that the indemnification clause should be limited to only those damages caused by the subcontractor or those under its control.
Brad Burnham is a Vice President and Partner with Hotchkiss Insurance Agency, LLC, headquartered in Dallas, Texas. Brad leads a construction team of licensed agents and Risk Managers. Contact Brad @ 972-512-7727 or email@example.com Hotchkiss Insurance Agency, LLC www.hiallc.com
The Punch List is Triune’s proprietary blog for discussing issues and providing insights specific to the commercial construction industry. Copyright 2013 TMV, LLC (Triune). Any and all rights reserved.